Andi Cumbo - Writer, Editor, Online Writing Courses, Classes & Lessons

Lead With Your Ears – On Civil Discourse

| 16 Comments

Post this at all the intersections, dear friends: Lead with your ears, follow up with your tongue, and let anger straggle along in the rear. God’s righteousness doesn’t grow from human anger. So throw all spoiled virtue and cancerous evil in the garbage. – James 1:19-20

“Everyone feels unheard,” H said to me yesterday as we returned from the drugstore for our hair dye run. We were talking about how uncivil, angry, and downright ugly some folks can be on social media. “People don’t feel like anyone is listening.” I nodded, agreed, and then switched to thinking about the scrumptiousness of spicy cole slaw as we pulled up the restaurant.

But on the way home, I pondered her comment. There’s so much truth there that I’m not sure I can unpack it all the way. I certainly know that when I feel unheard I typically have one of two reactions: stop talking at all or get louder. I see both of those reactions around the web these days, and while I would never presume to make anyone else’s choices about how to respond to these very intense, powerful, painful, and often personal subjects, I’m not sure that either options – silence or shouting is the best if we want to understand one another. I think we need to listen to each other, share our thoughts, and then learn how to walk away to think about what we’ve discussed. I certainly need to do better at that rather than letting my emotions wrap around my lungs like vises.

When I teach argument in my composition classes, I point out two things to my students. First, to write a solid argument, they must understand why they believe what they believe. They need evidence and support that incorporates reason and facts but doesn’t necessarily preclude emotion. They need to honestly examine why they hold a position on a topic and learn to articulate that why calmly and clearly so that other people can understand it.

If they do not understand why they believe what they believe and if they do not have solid evidence for why, their argument can be broken apart like so many pig castles hit by flying birds.

Secondly, to write a solid argument, they must understand what the “opposition” believes and why they believe that. To make a clear case for their own position, writers must truly know why a person who disagrees might hold their own position. Without this knowledge, an argument isn’t sound because a writer might have missed a key point that someone could use to deflate the premise. But more importantly, this failure to recognize that the opposition has a solid perspective, even if the writer disagrees, sets their paper up to insensitive in tone and perhaps content.

Without these two elements of understand – knowing why we believe what we do and knowing why other people believe what they do – we can’t really get anywhere. We end up saying things like, “Gay people don’t deserve the same rights we do.” or “Christians aren’t very smart people.” (Two comments, incidentally, I heard just yesterday). If we pursued these lines of thoughts a little more deeply, we might find that what we mean is something more like “I don’t think the Bible supports same sex marriage, but I think God still loves gay people. I don’t know how to reconcile those things.” or “I’ve met a lot of Christians who take the Bible as true, and I don’t necessarily. So that’s hard for me to understand.” Or maybe we would find – as I did once – that we hold deep prejudices that have gone unspoken and unexamined our whole lives.

I hope we learn to listen, first, to ourselves and then to other people. I think we’ll find – as my students sometimes do – that listening helps us not only understand each other, but also helps us grow as people and make better, wise, more compassionate decisions about the things we believe and the choices we make.

Lead with our ears. I may need to tape my mouth shut to do that, but I’m really going to try.

What is your first reaction when you find yourself in a conversation about a heated topic? How do you engage the other person?

Several amazing folks I know are also posting about this topic today. If you would please check our their posts as well: Jennifer Luitweiler, Caris Adel, Kristin Tennant, and Kirsten LaBlanc. We are also discussing civil discourse over on Twitter using the hashtag #quickto listen. If you’d like to join in the conversation, feel free to tweet us or share a link to your post on this topic in the comments below. I’ll do my best (unless you ask that I not) to tweet out your posts as well throughout the day. Thanks for listening and for sharing.

Be Sociable, Share!
Buffer
Send to Kindle

Author: Andi

I'm a writer, teacher, and editor who is currently working on a book about the slaves who lived and worked on the farm where I now live. I blog daily at http://www.andilit.com I have three cats - Oscar, Emily and Charlotte - who have taken to living on the farm quite well - bird-, frog-, and butterfly-hunters all.

16 Comments

  1. i love it. yes, please. we’ll never get anywhere shouting ourselves breathless or opting out of truly engaging and loving those with whom we disagree.

    i posted a poem yesterday that follows your theme, too.
    suzannah | the smitten word recently posted..those without a horseMy Profile

  2. Great point about understanding how the “other side” feels or what they believe. My advice to myself–two words. Self control.

  3. Love this perspective. Gotta to know what we’re all fired up about in the first place. Reminds me of the old parenting truth, too: ” pick your battles.” because, really some of them aren’t worth having.

  4. Great post… I need it, I’ve been guilty of both of these, “stop talking at all or get louder” :(

    I hope to join in the conversation, but won’t be able to until later today. But until then I’ll be thinking about being #quicktolisten.
    Janet Oberholtzer recently posted..Thinking about what if it all goes right.My Profile

  5. Andi, I first try to avoid the heated discourse. I don’t believe that peace is the absence of conflict, but I just think many of these topics are rooted in bigger topics altogether. It can easily have a domino effect. If we engage in a heated topic, I try to do so as delicately and humbly as possible and also stating from my personal experiences.
    Jim recently posted..Book Review: Wrecked by Jeff GoinsMy Profile

    • I absolutely agree, Jim. These “small” issues are often offshoots of larger ideas and ideologies. That’s one of the reasons I love a good dialogue, even a heated one, because it’s challenging for me especially. I don’t want us to stop talking to one another . . . there’s no community in that. I just want us to do it well.
      Andi recently posted..Cat Pee to Timberframe – Journeys and DreamsMy Profile

  6. “Secondly, to write a solid argument, they must understand what the “opposition” believes and why they believe that. ” So important – and then to meet on common ground with people. “I agree with you here, but then I think…” It’s so frustrating to discuss with people who only pick at all the ways they disagree, when I know we have some things in common. That just makes me angry and want to walk away from them b/c their goal is not unity.

  7. I love that translation—”lead with your ears.”

    And you’re spot on, here: “…when I feel unheard I typically have one of two reactions: stop talking at all or get louder.” You’re right—neither approach gets us anywhere.

    Thanks for your wise insights, and for suggesting we all join together in our posts today.
    Kristin T. (@kt_writes) recently posted..Can love silence all this shouting?My Profile

  8. While I completely agree with what you said, I also think that the idea of changing others’ minds needs to be taken into consideration. Often, it seems we assume we haven’t been heard if the listeners don’t change their minds to agree with us.

    I notice this in my ‘real job’ when we’re asked to reconsider our regulatory decisions. If we do take the time to look at the information again but don’t change our minds, we’re accused of not having reconsidered at all. The fact that the information can be looked at again without a change of opinion doesn’t seem to be an option.

    I think much of the vitriol we hear has to do with the desire of some to have everyone agree with their stances. If opinions aren’t changed, they believe they haven’t been heard and therefore need to be louder or speak more blatantly. This painful discourse won’t stop until everyone agrees that we can all have different opinions and still coexist peacefully. Not an easy task when some groups firmly believe thier way is the only way.

    • Absolutely agreed, Sharry. We can disagree and coexist. In fact, I think that’s part of the point. If we were all the same in opinion or skill or perspective, we would all be bored, and nothing would get done. Difference is valuable.

      Yet, if we disagree, we are quick to dismiss on another. So sad. I’m guilty of that, and what I’ve lost for that, I don’t even know how to begin to grieve.
      Andi recently posted..Rethinking the Southern CauseMy Profile

Leave a Reply

Required fields are marked *.


CommentLuv badge